Damek.

It really is priceless. One has to wonder if it’s really a snide attempt to make fun of conservatives, but apparently the domain is registered to Phyllis Schlafly’s son, so it’s probably not a joke. Although I’m sure by now many of the entries are being turned into parodies by liberals, since the whole point of a wiki is that anyone can edit it. (E.g., someone’s edited the Bill Clinton entry to fun effect, and at the time I write this no one’s “fixed” it yet.)

Anyway, some fake conservative Jon Swift has a great entry highlighting some of the really silly motivations and assumptions of the site, like some of the “biases” they claim Wikipedia has, such as, say, using non-American spellings of some English words. Silly Wikipedia.

Pandagon highlights the entry on Orwell’s 1984, which helpfully informs us that it’s a utopian novel with a possibly ambiguous but definitely confusing ending.

Sadly No highlights the entry on Unicorns which presents absolute proof that they definitely once existed, and possibly may still be alive since, duh, Noah would have put two on the Ark.

Finally, Lawyers Guns & Money highlights the entry on “judicial activism” which, well, you can guess.

As a last comment, it sure is evil of liberals to all go visit Conservapedia at once, slowing down the site to the point of killing it. Damn liberals? Damn conservative propaganda websites that can’t handle traffic from more than ten people.